PUBLIC
- The CRAYS Funding Partner proposition
- The six underwriting questions
- Dossier categories, governance and lender independence
- Relationship request and safe login actions
- An honest absence of public lender or case metrics

FOR FUNDING PARTNERS
CRAYS prepares a versioned financing dossier around an assigned Candidate–Deal Match: borrower context, capital need, property and market evidence, operating assumptions, scenarios and opening dependencies. Your institution reviews only the evidence released to its relationship, asks its own questions and independently decides whether and on what terms to proceed.
THE DECISION BOUNDARY
Where does CRAYS preparation end and our underwriting responsibility begin?
CONTINUE TO THE SIX QUESTIONSCRAYS can organize and govern the evidence made available for a specific Funding Case. It does not make the lender’s credit decision, promise approval, set the lender’s terms or turn a Prepared Deal into a bankable or pre-approved proposition. Each lender applies its own policy, records its own questions, conditions and decision, and remains responsible for its regulated process.
Funding Case and Lender Review records, evidence versions and institution-specific release scope remain distinct and auditable.
Questions, conditions, policy and the final decision belong to the lender reviewing that assigned case.
SIX UNDERWRITING QUESTIONS
Public educational content. No borrower, property, model, document, decision or case value is exposed here.
Confirmed Candidate/entity context, relevant organization relationship, applicable identity/KYC/AML, equity and source-of-funds evidence.
Boundary — Registration or browsing never triggers these checks. Required borrower-readiness evidence must be complete or explicitly not applicable before dossier handoff.
Reconciled capital requirement, committed equity, use of funds, timing and proposed structure.
Boundary — A request or model is not an approved facility, commitment or drawdown.
Versioned revenue, cost, ramp, base, downside, sensitivity and debt-service assumptions.
Boundary — Forecasts are not actuals or repayment guarantees. Definitions, periods, sources and exclusions stay visible.
Approved case-scoped property, access, catchment, competition, lease and Format-fit evidence.
Boundary — Evidence is source-, date- and version-limited and never a demand, valuation or property-acceptance guarantee.
Lease, design, planning, construction, equipment or inventory, supplier, system, training and launch dependencies with owners and status.
Boundary — Target dates and budgets remain conditional. A plan is not a guaranteed opening or final cost.
Versioned documents, questions, conditions, decisions, drawdown evidence and agreed monitoring definitions.
Boundary — Each condition stays with its lender and review. CRAYS does not universalize one lender’s decision.
A SCOPED DOSSIER
Can our team see what is sourced, assumed, missing and superseded?
Each artifact must expose source, as-of date, version, status, assumptions, exclusions and release scope. A package heading does not make the dossier complete.
PUBLIC AND RELATIONSHIP-SCOPED ACCESS
Private lender-release authority requires deliberate case-specific Candidate financing intent, complete and current applicable regulated checks, Candidate authorization or consent where required, an approved institution relationship, one assigned Lender Review and explicit release of the exact evidence version. Login or an open gate is never enough.
PARTNER PATHWAY
Funding PartnerIdentify the institution, markets, product scope and authorized contacts.
CRAYSReceive the request without granting access.
OutputPending relationship
Funding PartnerSupply applicable organization and authority information.
CRAYSVerify the institution, coverage and authorized users.
OutputApproved or declined relationship
Funding PartnerAccept case-specific confidentiality and access scope.
CRAYSConfirm borrower-readiness gates, one Lender Review and the exact approved evidence release.
OutputAssigned review
Funding PartnerReview, question and record the institution’s own decision and conditions.
CRAYSPreserve versions, responses, release history, audit history and the next gate.
OutputIndependent lender outcome
Funding PartnerConfirm any agreed evidence, conditions and monitoring definitions.
CRAYSTrack only the agreed scoped records and handoffs.
OutputGoverned continuation or closure
This is the intended sequence, not evidence that Portal, assignment, regulated checks, evidence release, lender send, monitoring or provider workflows are live end to end. Nothing guarantees assignment, volume, approval, terms, drawdown, repayment or a continuing relationship.
FOUR VENTURES, ONE EVIDENCE DISCIPLINE
Coffee, Retail, Gym and Clubs may have different customer drivers, space patterns, equipment or inventory needs, operating assumptions and opening dependencies. Source, version, status, assumption, release and independent decision remain shared. No Gym-only member, studio or equipment model is generalized to all Ventures.
Daypart, service flow, production and local supply
Category, inventory, service and merchandising
Membership, training, equipment and operating capacity
Community, hospitality, programming and mixed-use operations
FUNDING PARTNER FAQ
No. CRAYS prepares and governs a case dossier. Each lender independently underwrites, decides and sets any terms or conditions.
No. The public page explains the questions, categories and process only. Private evidence is available only after deliberate Candidate financing intent, complete and current applicable regulated checks, Candidate authorization or consent where required, an approved institution relationship, Lender Review assignment and explicit release of that evidence version.
No. Registration begins relationship review only. Applicable regulated checks begin at their case-specific gate; required borrower-readiness evidence must be complete or explicitly not applicable before dossier handoff.
No. The dossier must show which evidence exists, its source, version and status, what is assumed or missing and what remains unresolved. Category headings never prove completeness.
The decision remains on that Lender Review. The separate Funding Case and underlying records may remain, subject to lawful retention. Any review by another lender requires a separate eligible relationship, applicable Candidate approval or consent, new assignment and approved evidence release; routing is never automatic.
They share evidence governance, not one identical model. Customer drivers, property context, operating assumptions, capital uses and opening dependencies remain Venture- and Format-specific.
Both actions enter the safe shared Portal flow. They encode no role or case state in the URL and perform no finance, evidence release or provider action.